丰满少妇人妻无码专区,国产精品无码翘臀在线观看,xx性欧美肥妇精品久久久久久,国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩

Skip to content Skip to navigation

By Matthew Hand
Product Line Specialist
Thomson Industries, Inc
.
www.thomsonlinear.com, thomson@thomsonlinear.com

When machine designers need fast, accurate control over the linear movement of the heaviest loads, they typically choose profile rail linear guides over round rail guides. Profile rails, sometimes called square rails, offer increased rigidity and stiffness over round rail products, as well as high load capacity in a small package. But profile rails can differ significantly in rigidity, load capacity, travel accuracy, smoothness of operation, speed, and come in various sizes and mounting configurations.

Architectural options

Profile rail architectures vary mostly in the shape and arrangement of the rolling elements. The primary options are: double back architecture with ball bearings, double back architecture with roller bearings and double face architecture with ball bearings.

  • The double-back with ball bearings architecture, uses two sets of ball bearings running back to back inside of the rail, providing high moment load capacity. The ball track groove is only slightly larger in radii than that of the balls themselves, which cradles the ball bearings as they infinitesimally flatten under load, slightly expanding the contact area between the balls and the races.

 Profile Rail
Figure 1: Double backarchitecture with bearings

  • In the double back with rollers option, cylindrical rollers replace ball bearings, (Figure 2). This provides even greater stability over the convex balls, which have but a single point contact area, making them slightly more vulnerable to deformation under pressure.

 Profile Rail
Figure 2: Double-backed architecture, with rollers

  • With the double face architecture with ball bearings, rails are much more tolerant of mounting surface inaccuracies, but compromise rigidity and moment load capacity. It uses four bearing tracks, which are deployed face to face on the top of the rail, rather than inside of it (Figure 3). The double-faced bearing arrangement results in equal load-carrying capacity in all directions.

 
Figure 3: Double faced architecture, with ball bearings

Choosing which architecture is right for which application requires balancing tradeoffs in the areas of rigidity, capacity, accuracy, smoothness, size, durability and cost. Other profile architectures do exist but this article is focusing on the industry leaders.

Exploring the tradeoffs

Choice of bearing architecture begins with a preliminary determination of the following information:

  • The mass of the load
  • The location of the load, e.g. placed on top of the carriage or to the side
  • Required accuracy
  • Desired travel life
  • System mounting constraints

The rigidity, load bearing capacity, and tracking accuracy of the double backed architectures, make them ideal for demanding applications including high load industrial automation, machine tool equipment and precision measuring.

For the most demanding of applications, the roller bearing elements would offer even greater advantage. The rollers are more space efficient, which means they can deliver higher load capacity in a smaller footprint, which may be of value in tight quarters.

Many factors affect the costs and the design of a linear guide. For applications requiring the highest rigidity, motion engineers typically specify the double back architecture, using either ball bearings or roller bearings. For applications requiring less rigidity, they might specify what is called double face architecture, which might also be used with either ball or roller bearings. But these might not apply in all situations.

Although, the double backed architectures might, for example be the best high precision, high capacity applications, the double-faced architectures might be better for applications where smooth operation and cost are drivers. There are also ways to configure both these architectures to make them more rigid as well as smoother.

It all comes back to determining what is the intended load and where it will be placed. There are also many selection tools that guide in the selection of the configurations to meet customer needs. Thomson, for example, provides tools that calculate application numbers through a comprehensive set of algorithms and compares results to a database of available technology to determine an optimized solution set.

To further assist design engineers in making the right choices, device vendors such as Thomson, provide design resources, including teams of application engineers who assist in identifying the optimal solution, technical collateral, white papers, webinars and video instruction.

With so many options available, the final choice comes down to the engineers’ judgment and their reading of their customer’s preferences – stated and unstated – which will result in the final design.

back to top 一本无码人妻在中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码片VR一区二区三区| 真实国产精品视频400部| 国产精品成人一区无码| 久久久久久久久久久鸭| 欧美精品人人做人人爱视频| 97久久久精品综合88久久| 午夜A级理论片在线播放不卡| 成人国产色情免费观看| 亚洲综合AV在线在线播放| 日韩 亚洲 欧美 国产 精品| 成人乱码一区二区三区四区| 小sao货水好多真紧h无码视频| 亚洲AV无码专区亚洲AV桃| 日出水了特别黄的视频| 国产精品成人免费视频免费直播| a国产一区二区免费入口| 国产亚洲精品第一综合| 国产一区二区三区久久精品| 日日躁狠狠躁狠狠爱| 黑人巨大无码中文字幕无码| 国产一区二区不卡老阿姨| 亚1州区2区3区4区产品乱码2021| 秋霞人妻无码中文字幕| 黑巨茎大战俄罗斯美女| 色欲色香天天天综合无码| 边做饭边被躁欧美三级| 久久久久无码精品国产AV蜜桃1| 国产成人精彩在线视频| 国产精华AV午夜在线| 国产成年女人特黄特色大片免费| 丰满五十路熟女正在播放| 国产精品久久久久电影院| 国产无套护士在线观看| 久久精品国产蜜桃AV麻豆| 亚洲欲色欲色XXXXX在线观看| 精品国产午夜肉伦伦影院| 亚洲成a人无码| 两个人看的www免费视频中文| 美女胸又WWW又黄的网站| 激情97综合亚洲色婷婷五|