丰满少妇人妻无码专区,国产精品无码翘臀在线观看,xx性欧美肥妇精品久久久久久,国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩

Skip to content Skip to navigation

By Matthew Hand
Product Line Specialist
Thomson Industries, Inc
.
www.thomsonlinear.com, thomson@thomsonlinear.com

When machine designers need fast, accurate control over the linear movement of the heaviest loads, they typically choose profile rail linear guides over round rail guides. Profile rails, sometimes called square rails, offer increased rigidity and stiffness over round rail products, as well as high load capacity in a small package. But profile rails can differ significantly in rigidity, load capacity, travel accuracy, smoothness of operation, speed, and come in various sizes and mounting configurations.

Architectural options

Profile rail architectures vary mostly in the shape and arrangement of the rolling elements. The primary options are: double back architecture with ball bearings, double back architecture with roller bearings and double face architecture with ball bearings.

  • The double-back with ball bearings architecture, uses two sets of ball bearings running back to back inside of the rail, providing high moment load capacity. The ball track groove is only slightly larger in radii than that of the balls themselves, which cradles the ball bearings as they infinitesimally flatten under load, slightly expanding the contact area between the balls and the races.

 Profile Rail
Figure 1: Double backarchitecture with bearings

  • In the double back with rollers option, cylindrical rollers replace ball bearings, (Figure 2). This provides even greater stability over the convex balls, which have but a single point contact area, making them slightly more vulnerable to deformation under pressure.

 Profile Rail
Figure 2: Double-backed architecture, with rollers

  • With the double face architecture with ball bearings, rails are much more tolerant of mounting surface inaccuracies, but compromise rigidity and moment load capacity. It uses four bearing tracks, which are deployed face to face on the top of the rail, rather than inside of it (Figure 3). The double-faced bearing arrangement results in equal load-carrying capacity in all directions.

 
Figure 3: Double faced architecture, with ball bearings

Choosing which architecture is right for which application requires balancing tradeoffs in the areas of rigidity, capacity, accuracy, smoothness, size, durability and cost. Other profile architectures do exist but this article is focusing on the industry leaders.

Exploring the tradeoffs

Choice of bearing architecture begins with a preliminary determination of the following information:

  • The mass of the load
  • The location of the load, e.g. placed on top of the carriage or to the side
  • Required accuracy
  • Desired travel life
  • System mounting constraints

The rigidity, load bearing capacity, and tracking accuracy of the double backed architectures, make them ideal for demanding applications including high load industrial automation, machine tool equipment and precision measuring.

For the most demanding of applications, the roller bearing elements would offer even greater advantage. The rollers are more space efficient, which means they can deliver higher load capacity in a smaller footprint, which may be of value in tight quarters.

Many factors affect the costs and the design of a linear guide. For applications requiring the highest rigidity, motion engineers typically specify the double back architecture, using either ball bearings or roller bearings. For applications requiring less rigidity, they might specify what is called double face architecture, which might also be used with either ball or roller bearings. But these might not apply in all situations.

Although, the double backed architectures might, for example be the best high precision, high capacity applications, the double-faced architectures might be better for applications where smooth operation and cost are drivers. There are also ways to configure both these architectures to make them more rigid as well as smoother.

It all comes back to determining what is the intended load and where it will be placed. There are also many selection tools that guide in the selection of the configurations to meet customer needs. Thomson, for example, provides tools that calculate application numbers through a comprehensive set of algorithms and compares results to a database of available technology to determine an optimized solution set.

To further assist design engineers in making the right choices, device vendors such as Thomson, provide design resources, including teams of application engineers who assist in identifying the optimal solution, technical collateral, white papers, webinars and video instruction.

With so many options available, the final choice comes down to the engineers’ judgment and their reading of their customer’s preferences – stated and unstated – which will result in the final design.

back to top 日本欧美视频在线观看| 午夜无码大尺度福利视频| 2021夜夜乳狠狠乳狠狠爱| 香蕉EEWW99国产精选免费| 综合无码精品人妻一区二区三区| 无码中文亚洲AV吉吉影音| 久久精品国产久精国产| 日欧精品卡2卡3卡4卡| 日韩精品久久久久久久电影蜜臀| 热RE99久久精品国产66热| 国产欧美国产综合每日更新| 色又黄又爽18禁免费网站现观看| 亚洲中文字幕久在线| 蜜桃久久久久久精品免费观看| 岳好紧好湿夹太紧了好爽矜持| 精品一卡2卡三卡4卡三卡免费| 欧美人与动牲交A免费观看| 日本护士毛茸茸| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院| 2021久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜| 国产高潮国产高潮久久久| 成在线人免费视频一区二区| 在线精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲AV综合AV一区二区三区| 国内嫩模私拍精品视频| 亚洲av最新在线网址| 黄色A级国产免费大片| 啪啪东北老熟女45分钟| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线播放| 啊轻点灬大JI巴太粗太长了欧美| 秋霞在线观看片无码免费不卡| 暖暖日本手机免费观看中文| 狠狠噜狠狠狠狠丁香五月| 亚洲av无码一区二区乱子仑| 亚洲另类激情综合偷自拍图| 国产内射性高湖| 久久精品国产99国产精品亚洲| 自拍偷区亚洲网友综合图片| 日韩插啊免费视频在线观看| 欧美黑人又粗又大高潮喷水| 久久综合给合久久狠狠狠97色69|